Text Of Clinton Testimony (7)
This is part seven of the uncorrected text of President Clinton grand jury testimony:
OIC ATTORNEY: As you yourself just recalled, Mr. President, Vernon Jordan not only discussed the subpoena with you that night, but discussed Frank Carter, the lawyer he had gotten from Ms. Lewinsky. And also Mr. Jordan discussed with you over the next few weeks, after the 19th of December, the -- in addition to the job aspects of Ms. Lewinsky's job, he discussed with you her affidavit that she was preparing in the case. Is that correct, sir?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I believe that he did notify us, I think, when she signed her affidavit. I have a memory of that. Or it seems like he said that she had signed her affidavit.
OIC ATTORNEY: If he's told us that he notified you around January 7th, when she signed her affidavit, that you generally understood that it would deny a sexual relationship, do you have any reason to doubt that?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No.
OIC ATTORNEY: So that's the affidavit, the lawyer and the subpoena. And yet, when you were asked, sir, at the Jones deposition about Vernon Jordan, specifically about whether or not he had discussed the lawsuit with you, you didn't reveal that to the court.
I want to refer you to page 72, line 16, is where this starts. It's going to go down -- it might go down somewhat.
Line 16: "Question: Has it ever been reported to you that he" -- and that's referring to Mr. Jordan. At line 12 you're asked, "Do you know a man named Vernon Jordan?" You answer: "I know him well."
Going down to 16: "Has it ever been reported to you that he met with Monica Lewinsky to talk about this case?"
This is your answer, or a portion of it: "I knew that he met with her. I think Betty suggested that he meet with her. Anyway, he met with her. I thought that he talked to her about something else."
Why didn't you tell the court, when you were under oath and sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, that you had been talking with Vernon Jordan about the case, about the affidavit, the lawyer, the subpoena?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, that's not the question I was asked. I was not asked any question about -- I was asked: "Has it ever been reported to you that he met with Monica Lewinsky and talked about this case?"
I believe -- I may be wrong about this -- my impression was that -- at the time -- I was focused on the meetings, I believed the meetings he had were meetings about her moving to New York and getting a job. I knew at some point that she had told him that she needed some help because she had gotten a subpoena. I'm not sure I know whether she did that in a meeting or a phone call. And I was not focused on that.
I know Vernon helped her to get a lawyer, Mr. Carter. And I believe that he did it after she had called him, but I am not sure. But I knew that the main source of their meetings was about her move to New York and her getting a job.
OIC ATTORNEY: Are you saying, sir, that you forgot when you were asked this question, that Vernon Jordan had come on December 19th, just three and a half weeks before, and said that he had met that day, the day that Monica got the subpoena?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: It's sort of a jumbled answer. It's quite possible that I had gotten mixed up between whether she had met with him or talked to him on the telephone in those three and a half weeks.
Again, I say, sir, just from the tone of your voice and the way you're asking questions here, it's obvious that this is the most important thing in the world and that everybody was focused on all the details at the time. But that's not the way it worked.
I was doing my best to remember -- now, keep in mind -- I don't know if this is true -- but the news reports are that Linda Tripp talked to you, then went and talked to the Jones lawyers and, you know, that she prepared them for this. Now maybe -- you seem to be criticizing me because they didn't ask better questions and (realize ?) -- if you didn't prepare them well enough to sort of set me up or something. I don't know what's going on here.
All I can tell you is I didn't remember all the details of all this. I didn't remember -- when Vernon talked to me about Monica Lewinsky -- whether she talked to him on the telephone or had a meeting. I didn't remember all those details.
I was focused on the fact that Monica went to meet with Vernon after Betty helped him set it up and had subsequent meetings to talk about her move to New York. Now, keep in mind, at this time -- at this time -- until this date here, when it's obvious that something funny's going on here and there's some sort of a "gotcha" game at work in this deposition -- until this date, I didn't know that Miss Lewinsky's deposition wasn't going to be sufficient for her to avoid testifying. I -- I didn't -- you know, so all these --
OIC ATTORNEY: Excuse me, Mr. President, you mean her affidavit? You mean her affidavit?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Excuse me, I'm sorry, her affidavit. Thank you. So I don't necessarily remember all the details of all these questions you're asking me, because there was a lot of other things going on, and at the time they were going on, until all this came out, this was not the most important thing in my life. This was just another thing in my life.
OIC ATTORNEY: But Vernon Jordan met with you, sir, and he reported that he had met with Monica Lewinsky and the discussion was about the lawsuit, and you didn't inform, under oath, the court of that in your deposition?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I gave the best answer I could based on the best memory I had at the time they asked me the question. That's the only answer I can give you, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: And --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: And I think I may have been confused in my memory because I've also talked to him on the phone about what he said about whether he talked to her or met with hr. That's all I can tell you.
I -- but let me say again: I don't have the same view about this deposition -- I mean, this affidavit -- that I think you do. I felt very strongly that Miss Lewinsky and everybody else that didn't know anything about Paula Jones and anybody about -- anything about sexual harassment -- that she and others were themselves being harassed for political purposes, in the hope of getting damaging information that the Jones lawyers could unlawfully leak.
Now, I believed then, I believe today that she could execute an affidavit which, under reasonable circumstances with fair-minded, non-politically oriented people, would result in her being relieved of the burden to be put through the kind of testimony that, thanks to Linda Tripp's work with you and with the Jones lawyers, she would have been put through. I don't think that's dishonest, I don't think that's illegal. I think what they were trying to do to her and all these other people, who knew nothing about sexual harassment, was outrageous -- just so they could hurt me politically.
So I just don't have the same attitude about this you do.
OIC ATTORNEY: Well, you're not telling our grand jurors that if you think the case was a political case or a set-up, Mr. President, that that would give you the right to commit perjury --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: -- or not to tell the whole truth?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir. In the face of their -- the Jones lawyers, the people that were questioning me, in the face of their illegal leaks, their constant, unrelenting, illegal leaks in a lawsuit that I knew and that by the time this deposition and this discovery started, they knew was a bogus suit on the law and a bogus suit on the facts --
OIC ATTORNEY: The question --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: In the face of that, I knew that in the face of their illegal activity, I still had to behave lawfully. But I wanted to be legal without being particularly helpful. I thought that was -- that was what I was trying to do.
And this is the -- you're the first person who's ever suggested to me that I should have been doing their lawyer's work for them when they were perfectly free to ask follow-up questions. On one or two occasions, Mr. Bennett invited them to ask follow-up questions. It now appears to me they didn't because they were afraid I would give them a truthful answer and that there had been some communication between you and Ms. Tripp and them, and they were trying to set me up and trick me. And now you seem to be complaining that they didn't do a good enough job.
I did my best, sir, at this time. I did not know what I now know about this. A lot of other things were going on in my life. Did I want this come out? No. Was I embarrassed about it? Yes. Did I ask her to lie about it? No. Did I believe there could be a truthful affidavit? Absolutely. Now, that's all I know to say about this. I will continue to anser your questions as best I can.
OIC ATTORNEY: You're not going back an your earlier statement that you understood you were sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the folks at that deposition, are you, Mr. President?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir, but I think we might as well put this out on the table. You tried to get me to give a broader interpretation to my oath than just my obligation to tell the truth. In other words, you tried to say even though these people are treating you in an illegal manner and illegally leaking these deposition, you should be a good lawyer for them. And if they don't have enough sense to write -- ask a question and even if Mr. Bennett invited them to ask follow-up questions, if they didn't do it, you should have done all their work for them.
Now, so I will admit this, sir. My goal in this deposition was to be truthful, but not particularly helpful. I did not wish to do the work of the Jones lawyers. I deplored what they were doing. I deplored the innocent people they were tormenting and traumatizing. I deplored their illegal leaking. I deplored the fact that they knew -- once they knew our evidence that this was a bogus lawsuit and that because of the funding they had from my political enemies, they were putting ahead. I deplored it. But I was determined to walk through the minefield of this deposition without violating the law, and I believe I did.
OIC ATTORNEY: You're not saying, are you, Mr. President, in terms of doing the work for the Jones folks, the Jones lawyers, that you could say as part of your not helping them, "I don't know" to a particular question when you really knew and that it was up to them, even if you really knew the answer, it was up to them to do the follow-up. That you kinda had one free "I don't know" --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir --
OIC ATTORNEY: If I could finish up, I've been very patient, Mr. President, in letting you finish. You didn't think you had a free shot to say, "I don't know" or "I don't recall," but when you really did know and you did recall and it was just up to them, even if you weren't telling the truth, to do a follow-up and to catch you?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir, I'm not saying that. And if I could give you one example, that's why I felt that I had to come back to that question where I said "I don't know that" and talk about Bruce Lindsey because I was trying -- I was honestly trying to remember how I'd first heard this. I wasn't hung up about talking about this. All I'm saying is the -- it -- let me saying something sympathetic to you. I've been pretty tough, so let me say something sympathetic. All of you are intelligent people. You've worked hard on this, you've worked for a long time, you've gotten all the facts, you've seen a lot of evidence that I haven't seen.
And it's an embarrassing and personally painful thing, the truth about my relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. So the natura assumption is that while all this was going on, I must have been focused on nothing but this, therefore, I must remember everything about it in the sequence and form in which it occurred. All I can tell you is, I was concerned about it, I was glad she saw a lawyer, I was glad she was doing an affidavit. But there were a lot of other things going on, and I don't necessarily remember it all. And I don't know if I can convince you of that, but I tried to be honest with you about my mindset about this deposition, and I'm just trying to explain that I don't have the memory that you assume that I should about some of these things.
OIC ATTORNEY: I want to talk to you for a bit, Mr. President, about the North -- the incident that happened at the Northwest Gate of the White House on December 5th -- sorry, December 6th, 1997. If you'll give me just a moment. (Pause.)
That was a -- let me ask you first, in early December 1997, the Paula Jones case was pending, correct?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Yes, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: You were represented by Mr. Bennett, of course?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Yes, that's correct. Yes I do -- he was.
OIC ATTORNEY: How -- I'm sorry, go ahead.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, no. Yes, he was representing me.
OIC ATTORNEY: How often did you talk to him or meet with him, if you can just recall, at that time in the litigation?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, we met, I would say -- I wish Mr. Ruff were answering this question instead of me; his memory would be better. We met probably -- oh, for a long time we didn't met all that often, maybe once a month. And then the closer we got to the deposition, we would meet more frequently. So maybe by this time we were meeting more. We also -- there was a period when we had been approached about --
OIC ATTORNEY: The question only goes to number of meetings, not the content.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I understand. We're not talking about the content. There was a -- there was a period in which we -- I think back in the summer, before this, when we had met more frequently. But I would say normally once a month; sometimes something would be happening, we'd meet more. And then as we moved toward the deposition, we would begin to meet more.
OIC ATTORNEY: A witness list came out on December 5th of 1997 with Monica Lewinsky's name on it. Mr. President, when did you find out that Monica's name was on that witness list?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I believe that I found out late in the afternoon on the 6th. That's what I believe. I've tried to remember with great precision, and because I thought you would ask me about this day, I tried to remember the logical question, which is whether I knew it on the 6th, and if so, at what time. I don't -- I had a meeting in the late afternoon on the 5th -- on the 6th, excuse me, on the 6th, and I believe that's when I learned about it.
OIC ATTORNEY: Now, on the morning of the 6th, Monica Lewinsky came to the northwes gate and found out that you were being visited by Eleanor Mondale at the time and had an extremely angry reaction. You know that, sir, now, don't you?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I have -- I have -- I know that Monica Lewinsky came to the gate on the 6th and apparently directly called in and wanted to see me and couldn't and was angry about it. I know that.
OIC ATTORNEY: And she expressed that anger to Betty Currie over the telephone, isn't that correct, sir?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Betty told me that.
OIC ATTORNEY: And she then later expressed her anger to you in one of her telephone conversations with Betty Currie, is that correct?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Do you mean, did I talk to her on the phone?
OIC ATTORNEY: Monica Lewinsky that day, before she came into visit in the White House?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: (After a pause.) Mr. Wisenberg, I remember that she came in to visit that day. I remember that she was upset. I don't recall whether I talked to her on the phone before she came in to visit, but I may well have. I am not denying that I did. I just don't recall that.
OIC ATTORNEY: And Mrs. Currie and yourself were very irate that Ms. Lewinsky had overhead that you were in the Oval Office with a visitor on that day, isn't that correct? that you and Mrs. Currie were very irate about that?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, I don't remember all that. What I remember is that she was very -- Monica was very upset. She got upset from time to time. And -- I couldn't see her. As I remember, I had some other work to do that morning, and she had just sort of showed up and wanted to be let in and wanted to come in at a certain time. And she wanted everything to be that way, and we couldn't see her. Now, I did arrange to see her later that day.
And I was upset about her conduct. I am not sure I knew or focused on at that moment exactly the question you ask. I remember I was -- I thought her conduct was inappropriate that day.
OIC ATTORNEY: I want to go back and I want to take them one at a time. Number one, did you find out some point during that day that Monica had overheard from somebody in the Secret Service that you were meeting with Ms. Mondale, and that Monica got very irate about that?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I knew that at some point. I don't know whether I found out that that day. I knew that day -- I knew that somehow she knew that among -- that Eleanor Mondale was in to see us that day. I knew that. I don't know that I knew how she knew that on that day.
OIC ATTORNEY: That --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I don't remember that.
OIC ATTORNEY: Pardon me.
That leads into my second question, which is weren't you irate at the Secret Service precisely because they had revealed this information to Ms. Lewinsky on that very day, so very irate that you told several people -- or at least one person, that somebody should be fired over this -- on that very day.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I don't remember whther it happened on that very day. But let me tell you that the Uniform Secret Service, if that is in fact what happened, and I'll -- we'll stipulate that that is, that no one should be telling anybody, not anybody, not a member of my staff, who the president is meeting with. That's an inappropriate thing to do. So I would think that if that in fact is what I heard, when I heard it I would have thought that was a bad thing. I don't know that I said that. I don't remember what I said and I don't remember to whom I said it.
OIC ATTORNEY: It would be an inappropriate thing, sir. And that leads into my next question is that why did Mrs. Currie, on your instructions, later that day tell many of the Secret Service officers involved that it never happened, to forget about it?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: That what never happened?
OIC ATTORNEY: The incident that you were so irate about earlier, the incident of somebody disclosing to Ms. Lewinsky that Ms. Mondale was in the Oval Office with you.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I don't know the answer to that. I think, maybe, you know, I -- I don't know. I --
OIC ATTORNEY: You don't recall that you later gave orders to the effect that we're going to pretend this never happened --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: -- or something like that?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir. I don't recall that I -- first of all, I don't recall that I gave orders to fire anybody, if that was the implication of your first statement.
OIC ATTORNEY: It wasn't an implication. Actually, the question was that you initially wanted somebody fired; you were so mad that you wanted somebody fired.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I don't remember that, first of all. I remember thinking it was an inappropriate thing to do and -- I -- I -- I remember, as I usually do, when I'm mad, I -- after awhile I wasn't so mad about it. And I'm quite aware that Ms. Lewinsky has a way of getting information out of people when she's either charming or determined. It -- I could have just said, "Well, I'm not so mad about it anymore." But I don't remember the whole sequence of events you're talking to me about now, except I do remember that somehow Monica found out Ellen Mondale was there, I learned either that day or later that one of the Uniform division personnel had told her. I do -- I thought then it was a mistake; I think now it was a mistake. I'm not sure it's a mistake someone should be terminated over. I think that, you know, you can just tell them not to do that anymore.
OIC ATTORNEY: In fact, it would kind of be an over-reaction to get irate or terminate somebody for revealing to a former White House staffer who visits where the president is, don't you think, sir?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, it would depend upon the facts. I think on the whole, people who are in the uniformed Secret Service who are working on the gate have no business telling anybody anything about the president's schedule, just as a geeral principle. I didn't mind anybody knowing that she was there, if that's what you're saying. I could care less about that. But I think that the schedule itself, that these uniformed people -- you know, somebody shouldn't just be able to come up on the street and, because they know who the Secret Service agent is, he says who the president's with. I don't think that's proper.
OIC ATTORNEY: I agree, Mr. --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: But on the other hand, I didn't -- you know, I wanted to know what happened, I think we found out what happened, and then they were, I think, told not to let it happen again, and I think that's the way it should have been handled. I think it was handled in the appropriate way.
OIC ATTORNEY: And you have no knowledge of the fact that Secret Service officers were told later in the day something to the effect of, "This never happened. This event never happened." You have no knowledge of that.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I'm not sure anybody ever told that to me. I mean, I thought you were asking -- let me just say, my interpretation of this, of your previous question, was different than what you're asking now. What I remember was being upset that this matter would be discussed, by anybody; incidental it happened to be Monica Lewinsky; and that whatever I said, I don't recall; but then thinking that the appropriate thing to do was to say, look, this is not an appropriate thing for you to be talking about, the president's schedule, and it shouldn't happen again.
Now, the question you seem to be asking me now -- I just want to be sure I'm getting the right question -- is whether I gave instructions in effect to pretend that Monica Lewinsky was never at the gate. And if that is the question you're asking me, I don't believe I ever did that, sir. I certainly have no memory of doing that.
OIC ATTORNEY: Or anything to that effect.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: (Inaudible due to cross talk) -- what that means.
OIC ATTORNEY: (Inaudible due to cross talk) -- testimony?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: What does that mean, "anything to that effect"?
OIC ATTORNEY: Well, Mr. President, you've told us that you were not going to try to help the Jones's attorneys, and I think it's clear from your testimony that you were pretty literal at times. So that's why I'm saying I don't necessarily know the exact words. The question -- the question was, do you have any knowledge of the --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, but I --
OIC ATTORNEY: -- of the fact that later in the day, on Saturday the 6th of December, 1997, Secret Service people were then -- were told something to this effect: "This event never happened. Let's just pretend this event did not happen." Do you have knowledge of it, or not?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: No, sir, and I'm -- I didn't instruct the Secret Service in that regard. I have no memory of saying anything to anybody in the Secret Service that would have triggered that kind of instruction.
OI ATTORNEY: Did you tell Captain Purdy (sp), while you were standing in the doorway between the Oval Office and Betty Currie's office -- did you tell Captain Purdy (sp) of the uniformed division, "I hope I can count on your discretion in this matter," at the end of the day when you all were talking about that earlier incident? Did you tell him that or anything like that, sir?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I don't remember anything I said to him in that regard. I have no recollection of that whatever.
OIC ATTORNEY: We'll take a break now.
MR. : Thank you. 3:38.
(Resumption following the break.)
MR. : 4:01.
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Okay.
OIC ATTORNEY: Mr. President, these next series of questions are from the grand jurors. And let me tell you that the grand jurors want you to be more specific about the inappropriate conduct.
The first question was -- one of the grand jurors has said that: You referred to what you did with Ms. Lewinsky as inappropriate contact. What do you mean by that?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I mean just what I said. But I'd like to ask the grand jury, because I think I have been quite specific, and I think I've been willing to answer some specific questions that I haven't been asked yet, but I do not want to discuss something that is intensely painful to me. This has been tough enough already on me and on my family, although I take responsibility for it. I have no one to blame but myself.
What I meant was, and what they can infer that I meant was that I did things that were -- when I was alone with her that were inappropriate and wrong, but that they did not include any activity that was within the definition of "sexual relations" that I was given by Judge Wright in the deposition. I said that I did not do those things that were in that -- within that definition, and I testified truthfully to that. And that's all I can say about it.
Now, you know, if there's any doubt on the part of the grand jurors about whether I believe some kind of activity falls within that definition or outside that definition, I'd be happy to try to answer that.
OIC ATTORNEY: Well, I have a question regarding your definition then, and my question is: Is oral sex performed on you within that definition, as you understood the definition in the Jones --
PRESIDENT CLINTON: As I understood it, it was not; no.
OIC ATTORNEY: The grand jurors would like to know upon what basis, what legal basis you're declining to answer more specific questions about this.
I have mentioned to you that obviously you have privileges, privileges against self-incrimination. There is no general right not to answer questions. And so one of the questions from the grand jurors is what legal basis are you declining to answer these questions?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: I am not trying to evade my legal obligations or my willingness to help the grand jury achieve their legal obligations. As I understand it, you want t examine whether you believe I told the truth in my deposition, whether I asked Ms. Lewinsky not to tell the truth, and whether I did anything else with evidence or in any other way -- amounted to an obstruction of justice or a subornation of perjury. And I am prepared to answer all questions that the grand jury needs to draw that conclusion.
Now respectfully, I believe the grand jurors can I ask me if I believe just like that grand juror did -- could ask me, "Do you believe that this conduct falls within that definition?" And if it does, then you are free to conclude that my testimony is that I didn't do that. And I believe that you can achieve that without requiring me to say and do things that I don't think are necessary and that I think, frankly, go too far in trying to criminalize my private life.
OIC ATTORNEY: If a person touched another person -- if you touched another person on the breast, would that be in your view, and was it within your view, when you took the deposition, within the definition of "sexual relations"?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: If the person being deposed, in this case, me, directly touched the breast of another person with the purpose to arouse or gratify, under that definition, that would be included.
OIC ATTORNEY: Only directly, sir, or would it be directly or through clothing?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Well, I would -- I think the common sense definition would be directly. That's how I would infer what it means.
OIC ATTORNEY: If the person being deposed kissed the breast of another person, would that be in the definition of sexual relations as you understood it when you were under oath in the Jones case?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Yes, that would constitute contact. I think that would, if it were direct contact, I believe it would. I -- maybe I should read it again, just to make sure. (Reviews document.) And if this basically says that if there was any direct contact with an intent to arouse or gratify, if that was the intent of the contact, then that would fall within the definition. That's correct.
OIC ATTORNEY: So, touching, in your view then and now -- the person being deposed touching or kissing the breast of another person would fall within the definition?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: That's correct, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: And you testified that you didn't have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky in the Jones deposition, under that definition, correct?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: That's correct, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: If the person being deposed touched the genitalia of another person, would that be in -- with the intent to arouse the sexual desire -- arouse or gratify, as defined in definition one, would that be, under your understanding then and now, sexual relations?
PRESIDENT CLINTON: Yes, sir.
OIC ATTORNEY: Yes, it would?
Continue To Part 8 of the president's testimony.