David McCormick files lawsuit over counting mail ballots in Pennsylvania Senate race

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania — The campaign of David McCormick, who is in a neck-and-neck Republican primary contest for the U.S. Senate against celebrity heart surgeon Dr. Mehmet Oz, sued in a Pennsylvania court Monday to try to ensure counties obey a brand-new federal appeals court decision that could help him make up ground.

McCormick's lawsuit, filed after hours, asks the state's Commonwealth Court to require counties to promptly count mail-in ballots that lack a required handwritten date on the return envelope. It is the first — but likely not the last — lawsuit in the contest between Oz and McCormick, a former hedge fund CEO.

"These ballots were indisputably submitted on time — they were date-stamped upon receipt — and no fraud or irregularity has been alleged. The Boards' only basis for disenfranchising these voters is a technical error that is immaterial under both state and federal law," the lawsuit said.

McCormick's campaign said at least two counties — Blair and Allegheny — suggested they would not count the ballots as part of their unofficial result that each county must report to the state Tuesday.

Oz, who was endorsed by former President Donald Trump, led McCormick by 992 votes, or 0.07 percentage points, out of 1,341,037 ballots reported to the state as of 6 p.m. Monday. He has pressed counties not to count the ballots, and the Republican National Committee (RNC) said it would go to court to oppose McCormick.

In a statement, the RNC's chief counsel, Matt Raymer, said "election laws are meant to be followed, and changing the rules when ballots are already being counted harms the integrity of our elections."

The race is close enough to trigger Pennsylvania's automatic recount law, with the separation between the candidates inside the law's 0.5% margin. The Associated Press will not declare a winner in the race until the likely recount is complete. That could take until June 8.

It's not clear how many mail-in ballots that lack a handwritten date have been received by counties. Although he trails the vote count, McCormick has been doing better than Oz among mail-in ballots.

In an appearance Monday on a conservative Philadelphia radio talk show, McCormick insisted "every Republican vote should count" and said his campaign believes the federal court decision is binding on counties.

"The premise we should have, I believe, as Republicans is that all Republican votes count, and that's something we've all, I think, held as a principle," McCormick said. "And so that's the principle we're holding here. We held that principle before this court ruling. This court ruling just illuminated it more."

Ruling in a separate case late Friday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the state election law's requirement of a date next to the voter's signature on the outside of return envelopes was "immaterial." The lawsuit emerged from a county judicial election last year, and the three-judge panel said it found no reason to refuse counting the ballots in that race.

The ruling went against the position that Republicans in Pennsylvania have taken in courts repeatedly in the past to try to disqualify legal ballots cast on time by eligible voters for technicalities, such as lacking a handwritten date.

The law requires someone to write a date on the envelope in which they mail in their ballots. However, the envelope is postmarked by the post office and timestamped by counties when they receive it.

Meanwhile, the state law gives no reason that a voter should date the envelope and does not explicitly require a county to throw it out should it lack a date.

In an email attached to the lawsuit as an exhibit, Blair County's solicitor, Nathan Karn, told McCormick's lawyers that the county will not count them "until there is clear finality."

The federal appeals court decision affects just 10 Republican ballots in Blair County, Kern wrote.

But the decision does not appear to be effective until the court releases an opinion justifying its action, Karn wrote, and he pointed out that the state has not released guidance — which counties are not bound to follow — and that the court's decision could be appealed.

The Pennsylvania secretary of state issued such guidance on Tuesday, instructing election officials to count ballots that don't have a date on the return envelope, but said those ballots should be kept segregated. Counties were advised to segregate ballots that are undated or have the incorrect date into groups.

"A determination on whether the segregated tabulations will be used in certifying elections has not yet been made, given the ongoing litigation," the guidance said.

Adam Brewster contributed reporting.