Fed Leaves Key Interest Rate Unchanged
The Federal Reserve, confronted with the perils of a slumping U.S. economy and rising inflation, has decided for a second straight meeting to leave interest rates unchanged.
The Fed announced Tuesday that it was keeping its target for the federal funds rate, the interest that banks charge each other, at 2 percent.
The decision to leave rates alone had been widely expected by financial markets. The Fed is currently caught between the opposing forces of what many economists believe is a recession and rising inflation pressures, triggered by this year's huge runup in energy prices.
Keeping the funds rate at 2 percent would mean that commercial banks' prime lending rate - the benchmark for millions of consumer and business loans - will remain at 5 percent, its lowest level since late 2004.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues are being forced to navigate treacherous waters, trying to keep the economy from plunging into a deep recession while worrying that by keeping interest rates so low they could trigger a dangerous inflation spiral.
In a brief statement explaining its decision, Fed officials cited both concerns.
"Although downside risks to growth remain, the upside risks to inflation are also of significant concern to the committee," the Fed said.
The central bank started Tuesday's meeting with a new member. Elizabeth Duke, formerly an officer at a Virginia-based community bank, was sworn in by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke before the closed-door deliberations got under way.
Bernanke and his colleagues are being forced to navigate treacherous waters, trying to keep the economy from plunging into a deep recession while worrying about keeping interest rates so low that they could trigger a dangerous inflation spiral.
"The Fed is really locked in right now. They can't go forward or backward," said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at the Smith School of Business at California State University Channel Islands.
Responding to a severe credit crisis, the Fed last September launched an aggressive effort to cut interest rates. It reduced the funds rate seven times, lowering it from 5.25 percent, where it had been for more than a year, down to 2 percent in April.
At the Fed's last meeting on June 24-25, Fed officials passed up the chance to cut rates again. Instead, they signaled growing concerns about inflation pressures that have been made worse this year by surging oil prices, which hit a record high at $147.27 per barrel on July 11.
The inflation pressures have come while the economy has been staggered by a prolonged housing slump that has pushed home prices down by record amounts and a severe credit crisis that has seen banks tighten lending standards sharply after billions of dollars of losses on bad mortgage loans.
The combination of a weak economy and rising inflation has raised fears of stagflation, the malady that last beset the country during the oil price shocks of the 1970s.
The Fed board, which normally has seven members, has been forced to operate with vacancies during the current economic turbulence. Democrats, who control the Senate, have been reluctant to give Mr. Bush the opportunity to fill seats that could be occupied next year by a Democrat if Barack Obama wins the presidency.
The Senate approved Duke's nomination. But it has deferred acting on banker Larry Klane, who Mr. Bush nominated along with Duke more than a year ago.
Fed Governor Randall Kroszner's nomination by Mr. Bush for a full 14-year term is still pending. Fed Governor Frederic Mishkin has announced that he will leave the Fed at the end of August to return to teaching at Columbia University, creating another vacancy on the board.
Battling "Intensified" Risks Of Inflation
The Fed's problem is that its main policy tool, interest rates, can only address one problem at a time. The central bank cuts rates to spur economic activity and raises rates when it wants to battle inflation.
Bernanke acknowledged the opposing forces when he delivered the Fed's midyear economic outlook to Congress last month. He said that the risks to the inflation outlook "have intensified" while the threats from the prolonged housing slump and credit crunch "represent significant downside risks" to growth.
Some Fed officials have said that even with unemployment rising and financial markets still turbulent, the central bank may need to move to combat inflation. Rising price pressures are difficult to contain once they gain momentum in the economy.
Janet Yellen, head of the Fed's regional bank in San Francisco, said in a July speech that "we cannot and will not allow a wage-price spiral to develop." Charles Plosser, head of the Philadelphia regional Fed bank, said the Fed will probably need to boost interest rates "sooner rather than later" to battle inflation even if employment and financial conditions have not fully revived.
Even with those hard-line comments, many private economists are betting that Fed officials are not close to raising interest rates, hoping instead that their tough-talk against inflation will do enough to keep inflation expectations under control without having to resort to actual rate hikes.
Unemployment jumped last month to a four-year high of 5.7 percent.
The government also reported last week that the overall economy, as measured by the gross domestic product, rose at an annual rate of 1.9 percent in the April-June quarter. That's more than double the first quarter pace and significantly higher than the decline of 0.2 percent in GDP in the final three months of last year, the first outright drop since the last recession in 2001.
David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York, said he believed the rebound in GDP growth, while it may only be temporary, will take pressure off the Fed to cut rates again while recent declines in oil prices will help ease inflation worries.
"I don't see the Fed changing policy until next spring when I expect to see them start to raise rates," he said.