Bush: Saddam A Student Of Stalin

President Bush, seeking support for war against Iraq, called Saddam Hussein a "murderous tyrant" Monday night and said he may be plotting to attack the United States with biological and chemical weapons.

Saddam and his "nuclear holy warriors" are also building a nuclear weapons program, said Mr. Bush in an address to the nation, broadcast from Cincinnati on the anniversary of the first air strikes in Afghanistan.

"If we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed," the president told civic group leaders at the Cincinnati Museum Center. "Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression."

"He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists," Mr. Bush said.

His address opened a week of debate in Congress over resolutions giving the president authority to wage war against Iraq. The House and Senate are to begin debate Tuesday and vote by Friday, and the Bush-backed resolution is expected to pass by wide margins.

As CBS Chief White House Correspondent John Roberts reports, the White House contends Monday night's speech was meant to answer - in compelling terms - questions that Americans have about Iraq. But it was really aimed at Congress and the United Nations Security Council, both of which are considering tough new measures to deal with Saddam Hussein.

The President also sent a personal message to Iraqi commanders - urging them to disobey orders from Saddam Hussein and warning they could be prosecuted for war crimes if they use chemical or biological weapons.

The speech was intended to help break the logjam at the United Nations over a resolution demanding Saddam disarm, blunt Democratic opposition to a similar measure in Congress, and convince a growing chorus of anti-war protestors that it is the right thing to do.

As Roberts reports, a new CBS News/New York Times Poll finds that Americans still have plenty of questions about going after Saddam. Most notably they are wondering why the President - and Congress spending so much time on it. 70 percent of people say they want to hear more about the economy than war.

And while a majority of Americans support the idea of military action, they overwhelmingly want to give weapons inspectors time before sending in the troops and want the U.S. to wait for its allies before acting.

Doubts lingered at home and abroad about Bush's plans.

Even as he spoke, polls also revealed lingering unease among voters about going to war, particularly if casualties were high or fighting distracted attention from America's sagging economy. Democrats criticized Bush's insistence upon confronting Iraq alone if the United Nations failed to act.

Mr. Bush hopes an overwhelming vote in Congress will persuade reluctant allies in the United Nations to adopt a tough new resolution forcing Saddam to disarm — by force, if necessary.

Meanwhile, as he spoke, one man was arrested, after a march and demonstration in Cincinnati by more than 1,000 people opposed to U.S. military action in Iraq.

Police say a man who lay down in front of a police cruiser was handcuffed and led away.

Barricades and mounted police helped keep protesters a few hundred yards from the terminal.

Many of the protesters carried signs with slogans such as, "War is a failure of government." They chanted that by attacking Iraq, the U.S. would just be creating more enemies.

Mr. Bush had said U.S. intelligence shows Iraq to be building manned and unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, that could be used to target the United States with chemical or biological weapons.

He said Iraq had trained members of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda terrorist group, and that a "very senior al Qaeda leader" has received medical treatment in Baghdad.

"Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists," Mr. Bush said. "Alliances with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints."

On the anniversary of the first U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan, Mr. Bush tried to explain why Iraq should be the next front in the war on terror. He hoped to dispel doubts of domestic critics and to persuade other nations to support a U.N. resolution ordering Iraq to submit to tough new weapons inspections.

Advisers said the biggest questions Mr. Bush hoped to answer were: Why now? Why Iraq?

"While there are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place," Mr. Bush said. "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a murderous tyrant, who has already used chemical weapons to kill thousand of people."

"By its past and present actions, by its technological capabilities, by the merciless nature of its regime, Iraq is unique," Mr. Bush said.

The address was loaded with political implications, coming four weeks before the Nov. 5 congressional elections that will determine control of the House and Senate.

According to the poll, more than one-third of Americans fear the economy will get worse if the United States attacks Iraq, and half think military action against Iraq would increase the risk of terrorist attacks. Democrats suggested Mr. Bush should pay at least as much attention to the economy.

"The threats posed by Iraq are significant, yet our nation's economic security is just as critical," said Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe.

On the nuclear threat, Mr. Bush said Saddam has called numerous meetings with his "nuclear mujahedeen his nuclear holy warriors," and satellite photographs show that Iraq is rebuilding sites that have been part of his nuclear program in the past.

Mr. Bush asserted that Iraq could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year, although U.S. intelligence agencies issued a report on Friday placing the timeframe at 2010.

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud," Mr. Bush said.

Mr. Bush won support Monday from House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, one of the few senior Republicans in Congress who had voiced worries about his Iraq policy. Armey said he now believes Iraq violated terms of the peace agreement that ended the Persian Gulf War a decade ago. "I don't see this as pre-emptive at all," he said.

But Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., urged Mr. Bush to exercise the same restraint that Kennedy's brother, President Kennedy, did in refraining from an attack on Cuba during the 1962 missile crisis.

A first-strike attack on Iraq "is impossible to justify," Kennedy told the Senate. "Might does not make right. It is unilateralism run amok."

Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., who supports a hard line toward Saddam, nevertheless accused the administration of "gratuitous unilateralism" that could undermine the war against terror.

"In word and deed," the administration "frequently sends the message that others don't matter," the potential 2004 Democratic presidential candidate said in a speech prepared for delivery at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

To critics who say war with Iraq would detract from the war on terrorism, Mr. Bush said, "Confronting the threat posed by Iraq is crucial to winning the war on terror."

Mr. Bush, sensitive to charges that he is too eager for war, spoke mostly of efforts to disarm Saddam and, rather than emphasize the possibility of war, he pledged to help Iraq recover if war is necessary.

He said congressional authorization of a military strike "does not mean that military action is imminent or unavoidable. The resolution will tell the United Nations, and all nations, that America speaks with one voice and is determined to make the demands of the civilized world mean something."

"I'm not willing to stake one American life on trusting Saddam Hussein," Bush said.

With his back to a pale blue wall etched with a map of the globe, Mr. Bush laid down tough conditions for a new U.N. resolution, insisting that Saddam reveal and destroy all his weapons of mass destruction. Witnesses to Iraq's "illegal activity" must be interviewed outside Iraq and be free to bring their families with them, he said.

Weapons inspectors must have unfettered access to all Iraqi sites, he added.

"The time for denying, deceiving and delaying has come to an end," Mr. Bush said. "Saddam must disarm himself or, for the sake of peace, we will lead a coalition to disarm him."

Bush warned that an Iraqi military facing destruction "may attempt cruel and desperate measures" and that Iraqi commanders may be considered war criminals if they follow Saddam's orders.

"There is no easy or risk-free course of action," Mr. Bush said. "Some have argued we should wait, but that is not an option. In my view, that is the riskiest of all options because the longer we wait, the stronger and bolder Saddam Hussein will become."

Mr. Bush sought a softened tone toward the Iraqi people.

"America is a friend of the people of Iraq. Our demands are directed only at the regime that enslaves them and threatens us," he said.

At the United Nations, the United States continued talks with other governments, trying to gain approval for a Security Council resolution accusing Iraq of violating past resolutions, specifying what it must do now, and threatening force if it were to refuse.

In Vienna, Austria, U.N. arms inspectors began four weeks of technical training for their possible redeployment to Iraq for a new assessment. Mr. Bush wants the mission delayed while he presses for a tough new U.N. resolution.