Bush Defends Embattled War Policy
President Bush said Tuesday a U.S. military pullout from Iraq would be a terrible mistake, beginning a new push defending his embattled war policy. His Pentagon chief said, "Quitting is not an exit strategy."
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said of the Iraqis, "They know that they're the ones that are going to have to grab that country. And it's time."
The administration is under pressure to convince increasingly skeptical Americans that the president's strategy for Iraq is headed in the right direction. The president is to give a speech on the subject Wednesday at the Naval Academy.
Mr. Bush was greeted by anti-war protesters at an event in Denver, where he was to speak at a fund-raising luncheon. More than 100 demonstrators gathered to protest his policies in Iraq, carrying signs that read, "Bring our troops home where they belong," and "Occupation breeds hate."
The unrelenting violence that continues to claim American lives has contributed to a drop in Mr. Bush's popularity, to its lowest level yet, and to growing doubts about the war. It also has led to a debate in Congress about when the 160,000 U.S. troops there should begin to come home.
General George Casey has a plan to bring the U.S. troop level down from 160,000 to less than 100,000 next year, but he won't make any recommendations on carrying it out until after a new Iraqi government is elected next month, reports CBS News national security correspondent David Martin.
The GOP-controlled Senate voted 79-19 this month to urge the president to outline a strategy for "the successful completion of the mission." Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., attracted attention with his call for a withdrawal within six months.
The administration has responded by counseling patience while also signaling it is planning for a way out. Mr. Bush, speaking to reporters from El Paso, Texas, rejected any immediate withdrawal in unusually personal terms.
"I want to defeat the terrorists. And I want our troops to come home," the president said. "But I don't want them to come home without having achieved victory."
His speech Wednesday at Annapolis, Md., was to focus on progress in the effort to train an Iraqi security force and allow the gradual exit of U.S. military forces.
Later speeches over the next two weeks are to emphasize the strides being made in establishing a stable, democratic government and creating a viable economy.
In June, Mr. Bush delivered a prime-time address from Fort Bragg, N.C., on the first anniversary of Iraq's sovereignty. Later in the summer, the president tried to blunt the message of anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, who camped outside his Texas ranch. He returned to the war theme on Veterans Day with a speech accusing congressional Democrats of being "deeply irresponsible" in their criticism of the way he portrayed intelligence about Iraq before the war.
Democratic Sen. Jack Reed, a member of the Armed Services Committee and a former Army Ranger who visited Iraq last month, said the president must give "an honest assessment" pointing out not only the successes in Iraq, but the remaining pitfalls.
"We have to go forward with a plan, not just slogans," he said.
On Tuesday, Rumsfeld gave a preview of the administration's argument that Iraqi security forces are improving. He said about 29 military bases have been turned over to Iraqi control; the Iraqi army has seven division and 31 brigade headquarters in operation, compared with none 16 months ago; the number of Iraqi army battalions "in the fight" is now 95, compared with five 15 months ago, and there are now over 212,000 trained and equipped security forces, compared with 96,000 last year.
Rumsfeld also said he disagrees with calling the enemy in Iraq part of an "insurgency" because they don't have a legitimate gripe. But the defense secretary acknowledged his point might not be supported by the standard definition of "insurgent." Webster's New World College Dictionary defines the term as "rising up against established authority."
Rumsfeld noted changes in several areas once known for strife. Baghdad's infamously dangerous airport road is seeing a sharp decline in attacks under the control of an Iraqi police battalion, he said.
But CBS News correspondent Lara Logan reports that simply is not true.
"An Iraqi police battalion set up checkpoints along airport road in April, and they've been very effective in helping reduce attacks on airport road, but I confirmed tonight with American officials here in Baghdad, and I certainly saw for myself when I spent several weeks on that road in August and September, that American soldiers are in control," Logan said.
Rumsfeld also said that the city's once-violent Haifa Street is largely peaceful under the control of an Iraqi army battalion.
"The people who've been denigrating the Iraqi security forces are flat wrong," he said. "They're doing a darn good job, and they're doing an increasingly better job every day, every week, every month."
But Logan reports that the street appears to be under control because insurgents struck a deal with Iraqi authorities, and those who were attacking on Haifa street are now using that as a command base and attacking elsewhere in Baghdad.
There is also an intelligence report that a chief aide to Abu Musa al Zarqawi, the terrorist leader responsible for the deadliest suicide bombings, has been arrested in Syria which he used as a base for funneling foreign fighters and suicide bombers into Iraq, reports Martin.
Despite the progress cited by administration officials, one key factor shows no sign of improving — an average of three flag-draped coffins are coming home each day over the past two months, the highest since last January, reports Martin.
Rumsfeld said leaving Iraq before the country is completely ready to secure itself would only invite more terrorist violence and put Americans at greater risk.
His words echoed the president, who promised the judgment of military commanders, not political considerations, would determine troop levels.
"People don't want me making decisions based on politics," Mr. Bush said. "They want me making decisions based on the recommendations of our generals on the ground. And that's exactly who I'll be listening to."
Reed, designated by the Democrats to rebut the president, sounded themes strikingly similar to those coming out of the administration. He said that an immediate pullout would be unwise, that troop levels must be determined by generals, that some progress is being made in training Iraqis and that transforming Iraq into a democracy is a huge task that could take some time.
But he said Mr. Bush must present a more realistic account.
"Those speeches over the last two years have left a big gap between the American public — what they hear from the president and what they see every day on television and read in the newspapers, and that gap has to close," he said. "This has got to be unvarnished."