Brooklyn Case Is Front Seat In iPhone Encryption Fight
NEW YORK (AP) - The Justice Department said Friday it will continue trying to force Apple to reveal an iPhone's data in a New York City drug case, putting it at the center of a fight over whether a 227-year-old law gives officials wide authority to force a technology company to help in criminal probes.
The government told U.S. District Judge Margo K. Brodie in Brooklyn that it still wants an order requiring Apple's cooperation in the drug case even though it recently dropped its fight to compel Apple to help it break into an iPhone used by a gunman in a December attack in San Bernardino that killed 14 people.
THE BATTLE OVER ENCRYPTION
- Draft Of Senate Bill Would Outlaw Unbreakable Encryption
- FBI Debates Whether To Share iPhone Hack With Apple
- Judge Orders Apple To Help FBI Retrieve Data In Another Case
- Did The Apple v FBI iPhone Fight Resolve Anything?
- FBI Breaks Into San Bernardino Gunman's iPhone Without Apple's Help
- San Bernardino iPhone Case Likely To Bolster Encryption
"The government's application is not moot and the government continues to require Apple's assistance in accessing the data that it is authorized to search by warrant," the Justice Department said in a one-paragraph letter to Brodie.
Apple expressed disappointment, saying its lawyers will press the question of whether the FBI has tried any other means to get into the phone in the Brooklyn case.
Apple had sought to delay the case, saying that the same technique the FBI was using to get information from the phone in California might work with the drug case phone, eliminating the need for additional litigation.
Federal prosecutors told Brodie on Friday that they would not modify their March request for her to overturn a February ruling concluding that the centuries-old All Writs Act could not be used to force Apple to help the government extract information from iPhones.
Magistrate Judge James Orenstein made the ruling after inviting Apple to challenge the 1789 law, saying he wanted to know if the government requests had created a burden for the Cupertino, California-based company.
In challenging Orenstein's ruling, the government said the jurist had overstepped his powers, creating "an unprecedented limitation on" judicial authority.
It said it did not have adequate alternatives to obtaining Apple's assistance in the Brooklyn case, which involves a phone with a different version of operating system than the phone at issue in the California case.
In a statement Friday, Justice Department spokeswoman Emily Pierce said the mechanism used to gain access in the San Bernardino case can only be used on a narrow category of phones.
"In this case, we still need Apple's help in accessing the data, which they have done with little effort in at least 70 other cases when presented with court orders for comparable phones running iOS 7 or earlier operating systems," she said.
Apple is due to file a response in the case by Thursday.
Meanwhile Friday, court documents unsealed in Boston showed U.S. Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler ordered Apple on Feb. 1 to help the FBI retrieve information from a locked iPhone that was seized from a suspected gang member.
In that order and an accompanying search warrant, which preceded a February order from a different magistrate in the San Bernardino case, Bowler instructed Apple to offer "reasonable technical assistance," including extracting data from the phone or providing the suspect's personal unlock code. It did not require Apple to attempt decryption of any data.
Apple opposed the request and there is no indication in the court records that the government pursued the matter further, although the criminal case is continuing.
The company declined comment on the case Friday.
___
Associated Press Writer Brandon Bailey in San Francisco contributed to this report
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press.