Rolling Stone changes apology over UVA rape story
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Virginia - Advocates for sexual-assault victims say Rolling Stone's backpedaling from an explosive account of a gang rape at the University of Virginia doesn't change the fact that rape is a problem on college campuses and must be confronted - even as some expressed concern that the magazine's apology could discourage victims from coming forward.
Since the story was first published, the account of the victim, "Jackie," a pseudonym, has come under intense scrutiny, most notably in a lengthy report by The Washington Post. Initially, Rolling Stone magazine was defensive of their reporting, but relented and published an initial apology that read: "In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced."
Rolling Stone also said that because Jackie's story was sensitive, the magazine honored her request not to contact the men who she claimed organized and participated in the attack.
Critics slammed the initial apology as victim blaming, and said it was on the magazine to scrutinize Jackie's story and report it from all sides.
On campus, most students CBS News spoke with were angry at the magazine -- not Jackie. Inter-Fraternity Council President Tommy Reid was among those who said he was unhappy with Rolling Stone's apology.
"I was frustrated specifically that Rolling Stone put a lot of the blame onto Jackie," Reid said.
A short time after their initial apology, what appeared to be a revised version of the apology was put up on Rolling Stone's website, reading: "In the face of new information reported by the Washington Post and other news outlets, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account."
Rolling Stone editor Will Dana took to Twitter in what appeared to be an attempt to mollify the growing chorus of critics in a series of tweets.
1/I can’t explain the discrepancies between Jackie’s account and the counter statements made by Phi Psi.
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
2/The fact that there is a story that appears in Rolling Stone in which I don’t have complete confidence is deeply unsettling to me.
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
3/We made a judgment – the kind of judgement reporters and editors make every day. And in this case, our judgement was wrong.
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
4/ We should have either not made this agreement with Jackie…
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
5/…or worked harder to convince her that the truth would have been better served by getting the other side of the story.
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
6/ That failure is on us – not on her.
— Will Dana (@wdana) December 5, 2014
Students, state government and education leaders, meanwhile, have pledged to continue ongoing efforts to adequately respond to - and prevent - sexual assaults on campus.
The lengthy article published last month used Jackie's case as an example of what it called a culture of sexual violence hiding in plain sight at the University of Virginia.
Alison Kiss, executive director of the Clery Center for Security On Campus, said groups who work in the area will be concerned about a "chilling effect" Rolling Stone's apology could have on sexual-assault victims reporting the crimes.
But she said the magazine's announcement Friday "doesn't change the facts: Sexual assault on campus is drastically underreported and false reports are incredibly rare."
Emily Renda, the university's project coordinator for sexual misconduct, policy and prevention, and a member of the governor's Task Force on Combating Campus Sexual Violence, said she didn't question Jackie's credibility because that wasn't her role. Renda knows Jackie and also was interviewed for the Rolling Stone article.
"Rolling Stone played adjudicator, investigator and advocate - and did a slipshod job at that," added Renda, a May graduate who said she was raped her freshman year at the school. "As a result Jackie suffers, the young men in Phi Kappa Psi suffered, and survivors everywhere can unfairly be called into question."
The original story noted that a dangerous mix of alcohol, date-rape drugs and forced sex at fraternity parties is by no means unique to any one U.S. university. In fact, the University of Virginia is one of 90 schools facing sexual-violence investigations from the Education Department.
But the University of Virginia was roiled by the article, whose main allegation was that too many people at the university put protecting the school's image and their own reputations above seeking justice for sex crimes. The story prompted protests, classroom debates, formal investigations and a suspension of fraternity activities.
Phi Kappa Psi, where the gang rape allegedly occurred on Sept. 28, 2012, was attacked after the article was published, with cinderblocks thrown through the fraternity house's windows.
The fraternity issued its own statement disputing the account of Jackie, who described being led upstairs by her date, who then allegedly orchestrated her gang-rape by seven men as he and another watched.
"We continue to be shocked by the allegations and saddened by this story," the statement said. "We have no knowledge of these alleged acts being committed at our house or by our members. Anyone who commits any form of sexual assault, wherever or whenever, should be identified and brought to justice."
College officials and state leaders said Friday's developments would not stop ongoing efforts to respond to - and prevent - sexual assaults on campus.
Over the past two weeks, the college community "has been more focused than ever" on the issue, University of Virginia President Teresa Sullivan said Friday in a statement. She asked Charlottesville police to investigate the alleged gang rape.
Gov. Terry McAuliffe's spokeswoman, Rachel Thomas, said the governor has asked for an investigation.