Colo. man accused of pushing wife off cliff wants evidence barred

DENVER - Attorneys for the Colorado man accused of shoving his second wife to her death off a cliff in Rocky Mountain National Park want details of his first wife's death barred from evidence during his murder trial.

In Monday filings in federal court, Harold Henthorn's attorneys also asked a judge to keep prosecutors from discussing a situation in which his second wife, Toni Henthorn, was struck by a falling beam at their cabin.

Henthorn is charged with first-degree murder in Toni Henthorn's fall during a Sept. 29, 2012 hike. Prosecutors have said he could not explain to investigators why he had a park map with an "X'' drawn at the spot where she fell.

Harold Henthorn and his first wife, Sandra CBS Denver

They also say there are glaring similarities between her death and that of Henthorn's first wife, Sandra Lynn Henthorn, who was crushed when a car slipped off a jack while she and her husband were changing a flat tire in May 1995. Harold Henthorn was the only witness.

Investigators have reopened the investigation into that case, which was initially ruled an accident. Henthorn's attorneys said they have received no new information about the case, and it would be an unfair distraction if prosecutors were allowed to dwell on it.

"The prosecution wants to distract the jury with several multi-day trials within the trial, aimed at destroying Mr. Henthorn's character," attorneys Craig Truman and Joshua Maximon wrote in the filings. "If the prosecution is successful in speculating about the past by slandering his character, it follows that the prosecution will never have to prove its case."

They also want to keep prosecutors from focusing on an occasion on which Toni Henthorn was struck by a 20-foot beam while working at the couple's mountain cabin. Harold Henthorn was again the only witness, and prosecutors claim it was an unsuccessful attempt to kill his second wife. Henthorn's attorneys say it was an accident.

A judge did not immediately rule on the requests, which could be discussed during court hearings in May.

f

We and our partners use cookies to understand how you use our site, improve your experience and serve you personalized content and advertising. Read about how we use cookies in our cookie policy and how you can control them by clicking Manage Settings. By continuing to use this site, you accept these cookies.